Creating Inspiring Workshops and Courses in Transdisciplinarity: A Guide - Manual / Resource - Page 107
Designing for and reviewing process and impacts
In either case, the foci, contents, approach, and most
relevant indicators and metrics should be co-designed with
all or key representatives of the project, and results must be
communicated and discussed transparently.
Further reading:
A growing body of literature addresses the questions of what to
track and evaluate in TDR projects:
•
Belcher, Brian, Claus, Rachel, Davel, Rachel,
Jones, Stephanie, Pinto, Daniela. 2021. A tool for
transdisciplinary research planning and evaluation.
Integration and Implementation Insights. September 2,
2021.
•
Meadow, M. G. 2021. Planning Evaluating Societal
Impacts Climate Change Research Projects: Guidebook
Natural Physical Scientists Looking Make Difference.
Tucson, AZ.
•
Wall, Tamara U., Elizabeth McNie, and Gregg M. Garfin.
2017. Use inspired Science: Making Science Usable by
and Useful to Decision Makers. Frontiers in Ecology and the
Environment 15 (10): 551–59.
These guides and papers offer specific categories of indicators
and metrics for inputs, processes, outputs, outcomes, and
impacts that are relevant both to science and society. Additional
resources can be found in the Shape-ID Toolkit, available at:
https://www.shapeidtoolkit.eu/guided-pathways/evaluate-interand-trans-disciplinary-research/
Practices Evaluation
p. 102
