Creating Inspiring Workshops and Courses in Transdisciplinarity: A Guide - Manual / Resource - Page 116
Navigating through normative differences: Normativity
•
Fazey, I., N. Schäpke, G. Caniglia, J. Patterson, J. Hultman, B. van
Mierlo, … & C. Wyborn (2018). Ten essentials for action-oriented and
second order energy transitions, transformations and climate change
research. Energy Research & Social Science, 40(June), 54–70.
•
Lawrence, M. G., Williams, S., Nanz, P., & Renn, O. (2022).
Characteristics, potentials, and challenges of transdisciplinary
research. One Earth, 5(1), 44–61.
•
Pesch, U., & van Uffelen, N. (2024). Normative Paradigms and
Interdisciplinary Research. Social Epistemology, 1–15. Full article:
Normative Paradigms and Interdisciplinary Research.
•
Scholz, R.W. (2017). The normative dimension in transdisciplinarity,
transition management, and transformation sciences: New roles of
science and universities in sustainable transitioning. Sustainability, 9,
991.
Integrating different fields of expertise: Boundary work
•
Cash, D., William, C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N.M., Eckley, N., & Jill, J.
(2022). Salience, Credibility, Legitimacy and Boundaries: Linking
Research, Assessment and Decision Making. KSG Faculty Research
Working Paper Series. Harvard University, Kennedy School of
Government: Cambridge, MA.
•
Clark, W. C., Tomich, T. P., Van Noordwijk, M., Guston, D., Catacutan,
D., Dickson, N. M., & McNie, E. (2016). Boundary work for sustainable
development: Natural resource management at the Consultative
Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences, 113(17), 4615–4622.
•
Colavito, M. M., Trainor, S. F., Kettle,N. P., & York, A. (2019). Making
the transition from science delivery to knowledge coproduction
in boundary spanning: A case study of the Alaska Fire Science
Consortium. Weather, Climate, and Society, 11, 917–934.
•
Edelenbos, J. & I. van Meerkerk (2015). Connective capacity in
water governance practices: The meaning of trust and boundary
spanning for integrated performance. Current Opinion in Environmental
Sustainability, 12, 25–29.
•
Goodrich, K.A., Sjostrom, K.D., Vaughan, C., Nichols, L., Bednarek, A.,
& Lemos, M.C. (2020). Who are boundary spanners and how can we
support them in making knowledge more actionable in sustainability
fields? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42, 45-51.
Integrating different fields of expertise: Integration
•
•
p. 111
Bammer, G., O’Rourke, M., O’Connell, D., Neuhauser, L., Midgley,
G., Klein, J. T., ... & Richardson, G. P. (2020). Expertise in research
integration and implementation for tackling complex problems: when
is it needed, where can it be found and how can it be strengthened?.
Palgrave Communications, 6(1), 1–16.
Fischer, C., Radinger-Peer, V., Krainer, L., & Penker, M. (2024).
Communication tools and their support for integration in
transdisciplinary research projects. Humanities & Social Sciences
Communications, 11(1), 120.
•
Jahn, T., Bergmann, M., & Keil, F. (2012). Transdisciplinarity: Between
mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecological Economics: The Journal
of the International Society for Ecological Economics, 79(July), 1–10.
•
Mazzocchi, F. (2018). Why “integrating” western science and
indigenous knowledge is not an easy task: What lessons could be
learned for the future of knowledge? Journal of Futures Studies, 22(3),
19–34.
Designing for and reviewing process and impacts: Reflection
and reflexivity
•
Lawrence, R. J. (2015). Advances in transdisciplinarity: Epistemologies,
methodologies and processes. Futures, 65, 1–9.
•
Pohl, C., Krutli, P., & Stauffacher, M. (2017). Ten reflective steps for
rendering research societally relevant. Gaia-Ecological Perspectives for
Science and Society, 26(1), 43–51.
•
Popa, F., Guillermin, M., & Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2015). A pragmatist
approach to transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: From
complex systems theory to reflexive science. Futures, 65, 45–56.
•
Redman, A., & Wiek, A. (2021). Competencies for advancing
transformations towards sustainability. Frontiers in Education, 6, 484.
References
