Creating Inspiring Workshops and Courses in Transdisciplinarity: A Guide - Manual / Resource - Page 118
p. 113
•
Pohl, C., P. Krütli & M. Stauffacher (2017). Ten reflective steps for
rendering research societally relevant. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for
Science and Society, 26, 43–51.
•
Scholz, R. W. & G. Steiner (2015). The real type and ideal type of
transdisciplinary processes: Part II -what constraints and obstacles
do we meet in practice? Sustainability Science, 10, 653–671.
•
Shape-ID Toolkit (n/d). Online.
•
Singletary, L., & Sterle, K. (2020). Supporting local adaptation
through the co-production of climate information: An evaluation of
collaborative research processes and outcomes. Climate Services 20,
14.
•
Verwoerd, L., Klaassen, P., van Veen, S.C., De Wildt-Liesveld, R., &
Regeer, B.J. (2020). Combining the roles of evaluator and facilitator:
Assessing societal impacts of transdisciplinary research while
building capacities to improve its quality. Environmental Science &
Policy, 103, 32-40.
•
Wall, T. U., E. McNie & G. M. Garfin (2017). Use-inspired science:
Making science usable by and useful to decision makers. Frontiers in
Ecology and the Environment, 15, 551–559.
•
Wall, T. U., A. M. Meadow & A. Horganic (2017). Developing evaluation
indicators to improve the process of coproducing usable climate
science. Weather, Climate, and Society, 9, 95-107.
References
